canadafred schreef:
>
> http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/html-structure.html tonnie still
> there?
Jepp, not during the night though.
> Absolutely brilliant. This cannot be the same page I looked at last
> week is it. If it is congratulations it is wonderful.
It is. I altered the looks a few weeks ago, the old design might still
have been in your cache.
I use as strict separation between markup and presentation - HTML and
CSS. By altering the stylesheet i can give the page a completly
different look without even having to change a bit in the documents
themselves.
Thanks for the compliment.
> I was going to question your Description but changed my mind after
> reviewing your Title and keywords a couple of times.
>
> Of course I am going to find some things that catch my attention. Those
> of the most concern to me are:
>
> 1. Things look well balanced in the <head>. Too many unnecessary tags
> in the <head> for my likings but that is a designer choice more than
> anything else, except this one, I can't seem to get myself pass it and
> move on: <meta name="subject" content="webdesign, html structure,
> searchengine optimisation"> what can I say. It is not spam because I
> know you a little, it is getting a little stuffy in here ( if you know
> what I mean ).
Yepp, know what you mean. And no it isn't meant to spam. I keep them
very descriptive and see what gets picked up by the search engines.
> 2. Be careful with symbols.
> <span class="code">"en"</span> should be <span
> class="code">"en"</span>
I see what you mean, but don't worry, the pages are delivered as
iso-8859-01 so it should be oke.
> Webdesign & SEO consulting should be Webdesign & SEO consulting
Yes, but it is, or did i mis it somewhere?
> 3. <A HREF="/websitedesign/" title="Website design - webdesign and
> Search engine optimisation">Webdesign & SEO consulting</a> I hope
> this links to a web page about Webdesign & SEO consulting 'cause
> that's the impression I'm getting from looking at the code. Actually,
> this may be very good only because you have used this lightly. <A HREF
> should be <a href lowercases, lowercases, lower ...
Yes it is linking to the main page of the English section and since the
whole section is generally about webdesign and seo.
<A HREF .... sloppy sloppy
Technicaly it doesn't matter, but it's not very nice coded i agree.
> 4. I don't know if this character will come out right in the Usenet
> format but here goes :
>
> · yep I think it is there, see it? Well anyway that is the character
> you have decided to use to separate text at the bottom of the page. Not
> a good choice as it is giving my validator warnings. I suggest
> something else, I don't know what exactly, maybe :
It doesn't give a warning in W3C's validator and even the Lynx -viewer
has no problems with it.
> Well that's about it for me, I guess. i did just have another look and
> the presentation is extrememly pleasing. I can almost smell the daisy.
> it's nice. I think that is my second run at critique for this page. The
> talent is clearly evident, you got yourself a pretty nice looking web
> page from my perspective. I would strongly recommend you for web design
> work and feel confident that you could provide most excellent SEO as a
> fringe benefit for choosing your design service.
Thank's!
> take care all
You to!
--
Website Design:
http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found:
http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates:
http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html