Els schreef:
> ** reposted in new thread on CanadaFred's request **
>
> [http://www.nrac.co.uk/test/]
> canadafred wrote:
>> T.J. is experimenting with various things he thinks is SEO techniques
>> and want opinions on the techniques. I tried to explain that an SEO
>> technique mostly involves the content and what he has provided is the
>> skeleton for the content. We all agree that the skeleton is spammy
>> looking and much is over-repetitive because it is a template and not
>> filled in, will it work ... I think it could provided that the content
>> justified the skeleton.
>
> Meaning - he would have to write a substantial amount of SEO related
> content in between what he already has, but without mentioning the
> word SEO ;-)
>
>> So for T.J., I personally am struggling with figuring out a way to move
>> you onto some other discussion. I thought about this this morning and
>> why don't you request an SEO critique on some of your existing work.
>> Real matter is just easier to analyze that the hypothetical.
>
> Yup, agreed.
>
> Since I think it was T.J.'s idea that more of us would show something
> to critique - I'll submit this one:
> http://locusoptimus.com/css-trickery...s-on-hover.php
>
> It's a set of 3 interlinked pages (see pagination at the top), and my
> goal was not to get the best SERPS for one keyword, but to be found on
> several different descriptions for the same problem.
>
> Some people say 'hover', others use 'mouseover', etc. I didn't want
> people who search for either to be left in the dark. ATM no one finds
> me, but that should be a matter of time, and perhaps slight changes to
> the content, although I'd rather leave it as is.
>
> Varying results so far:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=image...s+on+mouseover
> http://www.google.com/search?q=image...tyles+on+hover
> http://www.google.com/search?q=image+styles+on+hover
> http://www.google.com/search?q=image...s+on+mouseover
>
> But no results yet when swapping the order of the words around.

Hi Els,

Nice clean page and well structured.

A few points i noticed:

- no description
- no keywords
- numbers for links
- no headers
- make your title as short as possible
no need to use this @ Locus Optimus ©2005
put it in the description or place it on the page in a footer

- to me there are, i can see you use johns technique of 'no menu'
on the page, not enough further options.

all more or less minor points, but this one isn't:

- to long dokument name


It's oke to give a good hint in the name of the dokument to tell what it
is about. This one however is to long IMHO

ie-image-border-styles-on-hover-solution.php

In the last part of his post Matt Cutts points to the use of these
stretched filled with words URl's:

http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/

So far so good, here is my contribution:


http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/html-structure.html


--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html