** reposted in new thread on CanadaFred's request **

[http://www.nrac.co.uk/test/]
canadafred wrote:
> T.J. is experimenting with various things he thinks is SEO techniques
> and want opinions on the techniques. I tried to explain that an SEO
> technique mostly involves the content and what he has provided is the
> skeleton for the content. We all agree that the skeleton is spammy
> looking and much is over-repetitive because it is a template and not
> filled in, will it work ... I think it could provided that the content
> justified the skeleton.

Meaning - he would have to write a substantial amount of SEO related
content in between what he already has, but without mentioning the
word SEO ;-)

> So for T.J., I personally am struggling with figuring out a way to move
> you onto some other discussion. I thought about this this morning and
> why don't you request an SEO critique on some of your existing work.
> Real matter is just easier to analyze that the hypothetical.

Yup, agreed.

Since I think it was T.J.'s idea that more of us would show something
to critique - I'll submit this one:
http://locusoptimus.com/css-trickery...s-on-hover.php

It's a set of 3 interlinked pages (see pagination at the top), and my
goal was not to get the best SERPS for one keyword, but to be found on
several different descriptions for the same problem.

Some people say 'hover', others use 'mouseover', etc. I didn't want
people who search for either to be left in the dark. ATM no one finds
me, but that should be a matter of time, and perhaps slight changes to
the content, although I'd rather leave it as is.

Varying results so far:
http://www.google.com/search?q=image...s+on+mouseover
http://www.google.com/search?q=image...tyles+on+hover
http://www.google.com/search?q=image+styles+on+hover
http://www.google.com/search?q=image...s+on+mouseover

But no results yet when swapping the order of the words around.

--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
accessible web design: http://locusoptimus.com/

Now playing: Greenslade - An English Western