On Aug 15, 5:30*am, The Starmaker <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Big Bill wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:44:59 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > >I like Cuil.com
> > >I think it's Cool.
>
> > >I can do things in Cuil
> > >that I cannot do in Google.
>
> > >Also, Cuil doesn't kick you
> > >out when you do automated searches.
>
> > >You try automated searches in Google
> > >or Yahoo,
> > >and you're eventually presented
> > >with a error page.
>
> > >Cuil keeps on keeping on.
>
> > >I did more with Cuil in a "few
> > >minutes" which would have taken
> > >a month with Google, with all
> > >their error pages.
>
> > >With Goolge, I would have to wait
> > >till the next day before I can
> > >continue with my automated searches.
> > >And then, 10 minutes later, error pages.
>
> > >With Cuil, there's no wait! No blocks, no
> > >error messages.
>
> > >That's Cuil, isn't it?
>
> > So, you trying to kill this new engine or what? Anyway, so what if you
> > can perform automated searches - for now - if the results are crap?
>
> > BB
>
> You gotta take the good with the bad.
>
> "The sweet is not as sweet without the sour."
>
> If I cannot perform automated searches on Google, there are no results.
>
> With Cuil, I can perform automated searches, I just clean up afterwards the results.
>
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil2 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=11&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil3 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=22&sl=long ", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil4 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=33&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil5 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=44&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil6 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=55&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil7 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=77&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil8 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=88&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil9 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=99&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil10 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=110&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil11 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=121&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil12 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=132&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil13 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=143&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil15 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=154&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil16 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=165&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil17 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=176&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil18 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=187&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil19 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=198&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil20 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=209&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil21 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=220&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil22 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=231&sl=long", "1",
> "--- USA/International ---", "Cuil23 [Next 11]", "http://www.cuil.com/search?q={SEARCH_KEYWORD}&pi=242&sl=long", "1",
>
> Cuil results are not that bad if you understand how it searches...
> and it seems to be improving...daily. It gets better each day.
>
> I would say...in a year time..Cuil will definittly beat MSN search if it hasn't already done so.
>
> Just imagine Cuil...like some living young growing organism, ...moving thru the blood system
> of the Internet viens...it's alive and growing...
>
> Soon Cuil will be in your blood stream...the blood that flows from the Internet to your computer.
>
> For example:
>
> If you do a simple search like
>
> add.cgi
>
> http://www.cuil.com/search?q=add.cgi
>
> Cuil seems to do pretty good with the results.
>
> It seems to like "small words" for now. It's just a baby, it
> hasn't learned the big words yet. It's adapting to the Internet...
>
> or do a simple
> Add a link
> searchhttp://www.cuil.com/search?q=add%20a%20link&sl=long
>
> I can see "Add A Link"
> in the Title of the results all the
> way to the last results!
>
> That's pretty good for a newborn.

its yet another resource centric search engine - im getting annoyed at
this because aside from leisure im sure 99% of people use the net form
commercial searches so showing whitepapers, wikis, education sites and
magazines really doesnt give the best results

Mark
JOB WANTED
www.markrushworth.com